Why Is the Visa Bulletin Not Moving? What It Means for Your Green Card Wait
08/28/2026
Immigration Lawyer Chicago/ Resources/ Immigration Insights/ Why Is the Visa Bulletin Not Moving? What It Means for Your Green Card Wait
Immigration Insights
Article by Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. staff
08/28/2026
If the visa bulletin is not moving, that’s typically because demand for immigrant visas in a given category and country of birth has caught up with the number of visas available under annual and per-country limits. The United States visa bulletin is an allocation schedule. The State Department publishes it monthly to distribute a fixed annual supply of immigrant visas across preference categories and countries of birth. It then works down the queue in priority-date order until that month’s supply of numbers runs out.
A priority date that has not advanced is often a reflection of how many visas Congress has made available that year, rather than anything about the condition of a pending petition. However, even if a category doesn’t appear to be moving, there are still decisions an applicant can make—and deadlines they must meet—in the meantime.
Stalled cutoff dates generally have one underlying cause: demand for a visa category exceeding the number of available visas authorized for it by Congress.
Each month, the State Department receives a count of the applicants in each category and country of birth whose cases have been fully documented and who are awaiting only a visa number. These figures are reported by consulates abroad for applicants processing overseas, and by USCIS for applicants who have applied from within the United States.
Visa numbers are then allocated in order of priority date, beginning with the oldest, until the supply available for that month is exhausted. Where demand within a category exceeds the numbers available, the cutoff date published for that category is the priority date of the applicant at the front of the queue.
The supply of visas is fixed by statute and does not adjust to demand. The worldwide employment-based level is set at a minimum of 140,000 per year, and the family-sponsored level carries a statutory floor of 226,000. Under Section 202 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, no single country may receive more than 7% of those combined totals, and no dependent area more than 2%.
The limit is applied according to country of birth rather than country of citizenship. Where demand from a single country exceeds its 7% share, that country reaches its limit regardless of how many visas remain unused worldwide. This is why a category may be open to applicants from most of the world while remaining backlogged by more than a decade for applicants born in a small number of countries. Applicants born in India, China, Mexico, and the Philippines, for example, are currently subject (as of August 2026) to these limits across multiple categories.
A cutoff date may also move backward. Where demand materializes faster than the State Department projected, the date is pulled back so that the visas issued remain within the annual limit. This is referred to as retrogression.
Where a category is marked “U,” no visa numbers are authorized for issuance at all. That designation is applied once an annual, category, or per-country limit has been reached, and it may remain in place for the remainder of the fiscal year, until the limits reset on October 1.
Both outcomes occur most often in the second half of a fiscal year, after the categories under the heaviest demand have consumed the majority of their allocation. Advance notice is generally given: category-specific warnings are published in the narrative sections of the bulletin, frequently several months before a date is moved backward.
Green card date prediction tools operate from a single input: the movement of the published dates in prior months. However, the demand figures that determine the next allocation are not published by the State Department in real time. A forecast constructed from prior movement is therefore constructed from an effect rather than from its cause.
Where visa issuance slows for applicants from certain countries, cutoff dates are advanced elsewhere so that the numbers available for the fiscal year are used rather than lost. Once the demand generated by that advancement is reported, the dates must be pulled back to keep issuance within the annual limit.
Forward movement produced by underuse in one part of the system may therefore reverse within a month or two. A forecast built on the preceding six months of advancement would not anticipate that reversal.
Certain elements are, however, known. The annual limits reset each October 1. The per-country limits are statutory and do not adjust to demand. The State Department publishes its own forward-looking assessments in the narrative sections of each bulletin, and those assessments are a more reliable indicator than any third-party forecast.
If an application is properly filed, it remains properly filed even if its category is later restricted. It is held by USCIS until a number becomes available. However, the timing of this availability can affect other deadlines involved in a green card application.
The status of a category determines when an application for permanent residence may be filed from within the United States, and consequently when work authorization and travel permission become available to the applicant and to any of their dependents. It determines how long temporary status must be maintained, and how many extensions will be required to do so. It also affects dependent children who reach the age of 21 before a visa number becomes available.
An applicant has no influence over the bulletin itself. However, several of the decisions surrounding it remain within an applicant’s control.
When an application for permanent residence is filed during a month in which the category is open, several protections are established that a subsequent stall cannot interrupt. Work authorization and travel permission become available to the applicant and to any of their dependents. Where the application has been pending for 180 days and the underlying petition has been approved, Section 204(j) of the Immigration and Nationality Act permits a change of employer within the same or a similar occupation.
The EB-2 and EB-3 categories advance independently of one another, and for certain countries the EB-3 cutoff date has periodically run ahead of EB-2. When that occurs, a new petition filed in EB-3, supported by an already-approved labor certification, may retain the applicant’s original priority date.
A national interest waiver allows an applicant to petition for an EB-2 visa without requiring PERM labor certification or employer sponsorship. However, an NIW does not advance an applicant within the visa queue or exempt them from it, and each applicant is still subject to their country’s limit.
Under Section 202(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a married applicant may in certain circumstances be charged to their spouse’s country of birth rather than their own. In cases where an applicant was born in a country subject to a lengthy queue and their spouse was born elsewhere, this means they can apply for a visa that is subject to a different country’s limit and may therefore be more readily available.
However, this provision is narrow, and its application depends heavily upon the circumstances of the marriage and the countries of birth involved.
A child may obtain permanent residence alongside a parent only while under the age of 21. If government processing takes a long time—which it often does—a child can turn 21 while waiting in the visa queue and lose eligibility through no fault of their own. The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) exists to return some of that time.
CSPA subtracts the period the parent’s filed petition spent awaiting a decision from the child’s actual age on the date a visa becomes available. For example, if a petition took three years to approve, and the child is 23 when a visa becomes available, their calculated age is 20 (23 years old − 3 years waiting = 20). The child, therefore, remains eligible. Permanent residence must be sought within one year of that date.
However, CSPA does not return the years spent waiting for a priority date to become current after the petition is approved. Only the period between the filing and the approval of a petition is subtracted. For families filing in a category backlogged by a decade or more, the potential credit of a few years is comparatively small, and their child may age out regardless.
The specific dates governing this rule are volatile and have changed more than once in the past few years. For guidance on your family’s specific circumstances, discuss your petition with an immigration attorney.
An extended visa backlog generally requires that temporary status be maintained beyond the period ordinarily permitted. The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act provides two routes beyond the six-year maximum for H-1B status: extensions of one year if a labor certification or immigrant petition has been pending at least 365 days, and extensions of three years if an approved petition cannot proceed because of the per-country limits.
A priority date stops advancing when the applicants holding earlier dates in the same category and country of birth have consumed the visa numbers allocated for that month. The cutoff published is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached, and a date that does not move indicates that the queue ahead has not cleared. Movement in the bulletin is a function of visa supply and is not an indication of how an individual petition is being adjudicated.
Yes. Where demand materializes faster than the State Department projected, the cutoff date is pulled back so that the visas issued remain within the annual limit. A category may also be marked unavailable, in which case no numbers are authorized for issuance at all, in some instances for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Prediction tools extrapolate from prior movement, and prior movement does not disclose the pending demand that determines the next allocation. Forward progress caused by underuse in one part of the system may reverse within a month or two once demand appears elsewhere. The assessments published by the State Department in the narrative sections of each bulletin are ordinarily a more reliable indicator than third-party forecasts.
An application properly filed during a month in which the category was open remains properly filed if the category is later restricted. It is held by USCIS until a visa number becomes available rather than rejected. Work authorization and travel permission issued in connection with that filing run for their own validity periods, although the effect of a later change in the bulletin depends upon the posture of the particular case.
USCIS determines each month whether applicants may use the Dates for Filing chart or must use the Final Action Dates chart. The Final Action Dates chart applies unless USCIS states otherwise.
A stalled visa bulletin can affect your green card timeline, but there are still decisions to be made in the meantime. Call Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. at 312.444.1940 or complete our online contact form to review your priority date, your category options, and your status timeline before the next visa bulletin is released.
View Similar Articles