Immigration Lawyer Chicago/ Services/ U.S. Removal or Deportation Proceedings: What You Need to Know/ Denaturalization: Can a U.S. Citizen Be Deported?
A naturalized U.S. citizen’s citizenship can, under a narrow set of circumstances, be revoked through a process called denaturalization, and if that happens the person may face removal from the United States. Denaturalization applies only to citizens who naturalized—not to those who are citizens by birth—and it happens through a case in federal court, not immigration court, where the government must meet a demanding standard of proof. It has historically been rare, though the Department of Justice made it an enforcement priority in 2025. For the large majority of naturalized citizens who were truthful in their applications, citizenship remains secure.
If you naturalized years ago and are unsettled by recent headlines, it helps to understand exactly what denaturalization is, the narrow grounds for it, and the protections built into the process.
Denaturalization is the legal process of revoking the U.S. citizenship of someone who obtained it through naturalization. Once citizenship is revoked, the government no longer recognizes the person as a U.S. citizen, and they generally return to the immigration status they held before—usually lawful permanent resident.
It applies only to naturalized citizens; a person who is a citizen by birth cannot be denaturalized. Denaturalization also comes in two forms: a civil case brought in federal court, which is the most common route, and a criminal case, where loss of citizenship follows a conviction for unlawfully procuring naturalization.
The grounds for denaturalization are narrow. Citizenship can be revoked when it was:
The person did not actually meet a legal requirement for naturalization at the time, such as the residence, physical presence, or good moral character requirements.
The person hid or lied about something important during the process, and the truth would have mattered to the outcome. Common examples include concealing membership in a persecutory or terrorist organization, or obtaining citizenship through marriage fraud.
Two more specific grounds also exist:
Other-Than-Honorable Military Discharge
Someone who naturalized based on military service can face revocation if they are separated from the armed forces under other-than-honorable conditions before completing the required period of honorable service.
Early Affiliation With Certain Organizations
If a person joins a subversive or terrorist organization within five years of naturalizing, the law treats it as evidence that they concealed their true intentions during the process. That creates a presumption the government can act on, not an automatic revocation.
Civil denaturalization is decided by a federal district court—not an immigration court, and not by an immigration judge. The government files a civil complaint, and the case proceeds like other federal civil litigation.
Most civil cases
“More likely than not”
Denaturalization
“Clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence”
The burden on the government is deliberately high. To revoke citizenship, it must prove its case by “clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence” that does not leave the issue in doubt—a stricter standard than the “more likely than not” test used in most civil cases. The Supreme Court has also held that a misrepresentation generally must be material, meaning it actually affected the decision to grant citizenship, so minor or immaterial errors do not support denaturalization. These protections exist because citizenship is such a significant status to take away.
Because the stakes are high and the law is technical, anyone facing denaturalization should be represented by an immigration attorney. You can represent yourself, but it is not advisable.
If a court revokes citizenship, the person typically returns to the status they held before naturalizing, usually lawful permanent resident. That is not automatically the end of the story:
Possible removal.
If the conduct behind the denaturalization is also a ground of removability, removal proceedings can follow.
Loss of citizen rights.
The person loses the rights tied to citizenship, such as voting and holding a U.S. passport.
Risk of statelessness.
If the person holds no other nationality, losing U.S. citizenship can leave them stateless, which creates serious legal and humanitarian problems.
Family members who hold citizenship in their own right are generally not affected. Where a spouse or child’s citizenship was derived from the naturalization being revoked, however, it can be at risk—another reason to get individualized legal advice.
Denaturalization is involuntary: the government takes citizenship away. It is different from losing citizenship through your own actions.
Any U.S. citizen, naturalized or by birth, can lose citizenship by committing an “expatriating act” voluntarily and with the intent to give up their citizenship. That intent is the key protection—an expatriating act does not cost you your citizenship unless you meant for it to. If you act without that intent, you can keep your citizenship, including dual citizenship.
| Expatriating Act | How It May Be Viewed |
|---|---|
| Becoming a citizen of another country after turning 18 | May be viewed as choosing that country over the U.S., if done with intent to relinquish. |
| Swearing an oath of allegiance to another country after turning 18 | May be treated as a sign you no longer wish to be a U.S. citizen. |
| Serving in another country’s military, especially one hostile to the U.S. | May be seen as a significant conflict of loyalty. |
| Working for another country’s government after turning 18 | May matter, especially where it involves an oath or that country’s nationality. |
| Formally renouncing before a U.S. official | The clearest expatriating act; a formal statement that you no longer wish to be a U.S. national. |
| Being convicted of treason | A serious betrayal of the U.S. that can result in loss of nationality. |
Renunciation—formally giving up citizenship before a U.S. official—is the clearest of these. The others generally require proof that you intended to relinquish your citizenship.
Denaturalization has drawn renewed attention. In June 2025, the Department of Justice’s Civil Division issued a memo naming denaturalization one of its top enforcement priorities and directing government attorneys to pursue it in all cases the law and evidence support. The memo lists categories the government intends to prioritize, including national security threats, human rights violators, members of criminal organizations, and people who concealed serious crimes or committed fraud against the government.
This builds on earlier efforts: a wave of cases in the McCarthy era, renewed activity under the Obama administration (known as Operation Janus), and a dedicated DOJ Denaturalization Section created in 2020, later disbanded and then revived as a priority through the 2025 memo.
Even so, the legal framework has not changed. Every case still requires an individual lawsuit in federal court, the heightened burden of proof described above, and, for misrepresentation, materiality. Legal commentators note that these constraints mean denaturalization continues to reach a small number of cases involving serious misconduct, and that for citizens who were honest in their applications, citizenship remains secure.
Critics of the expanded effort raise concerns about due process, the human cost of family separation or statelessness, and the risk of citizenship being used as a political tool; the government frames the effort as protecting the integrity of the naturalization system.
The best protection against denaturalization is a naturalization application that is complete, accurate, and honest. Because denaturalization turns on illegal procurement or misrepresentation, the surest way to avoid it is to qualify fully and disclose truthfully from the start.
If you are applying for naturalization and have anything complex in your history—a prior immigration issue, criminal history, or a question about a past application—an immigration attorney can help you present it accurately. And if you have received notice of a denaturalization case, get legal help right away, because the deadlines and stakes are significant.
No. Denaturalization applies only to people who became citizens through naturalization. A citizen by birth cannot be denaturalized or deported, though any citizen can renounce citizenship or lose it through a voluntary expatriating act done with the intent to give it up.
Historically it has been rare, with only a small number of cases each year. The Department of Justice made it an enforcement priority in 2025, so scrutiny has increased, but the high burden of proof and the requirement of an individual federal court case continue to limit it to cases involving serious misconduct or fraud.
Usually not. The government generally must show that a misrepresentation was willful and material—that it actually mattered to the decision to grant citizenship. An innocent or trivial error typically does not meet that standard. Even so, accuracy matters, so it is worth reviewing anything uncertain with an attorney before filing.
It can. If the person holds no other nationality, losing U.S. citizenship may leave them stateless, which carries serious legal and practical consequences. This is one of the concerns raised about the process.
No. The government must file a case—civil denaturalization in federal court, or criminal denaturalization as part of a criminal prosecution—and the person can contest it and appeal an adverse decision.
Posted on Google![]()
Sumaiah AlbalwiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had the pleasure of working with attorney Kathryn Weber and her paralegal Hannah, and I couldn’t be more grateful for the level of professionalism, care, and attention they provided. Kathryn was truly outstanding — she is extremely knowledgeable in her field, incredibly patient, and explains every detail clearly so you always feel confident and supported. Her calm, thorough approach turns a stressful process into something manageable and reassuring. Hannah was amazing and always responsive, organized, and kind. Together, they make a strong team that truly advocates for their clients with compassion and expertise. I highly recommend Kathryn and her office to anyone looking for guidance from a team that genuinely cares about people and knows the law exceptionally well. Thank you for everything!Posted on Google![]()
ZIZO AlbaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can’t thank Kathryn Weber enough for her kindness, support, and hard work during my family case. She not only provided excellent legal guidance but also showed real compassion and understanding. I’m truly grateful for everything she’s done for me and my family. Thank you so much Kathryn 🙏🏻❤️Posted on Google![]()
Carolyn BraaksmaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Kathryn Weber and her team were truly exemplary in representing my husband’s immigration journey. Kathryn’s expertise, knowledge, compassion, and genuine care turned what could have been a stressful process into a positive and successful experience. We cannot thank her enough for her outstanding service and support. We give her our highest recommendation for anyone seeking help with immigration needs.Posted on Google![]()
Caren LedererTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very knowledgeable and professional, I feel confident in the advice and feel better knowing I can rely on Anne!Posted on Google![]()
Mohemed AhmedTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C., is a highly professional law firm that offers essential assistance, guidance, and support to its clients. Christina Murdoch, a Partner at the firm, has been exceptionally supportive, knowledgeable, and professional throughout our legal process. Her extensive experience and expertise have been instrumental in helping us make sound decisions that ultimately led to our complete success. I highly recommend Christina Murdoch and Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C., as a firm specializing in immigration law, processes, and procedures.Posted on Google![]()
hi INDiA hemant brahmbhattTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Exceptional Legal Support and Professionalism I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to Christina Murdoch for the incredible professionalism and care she demonstrated while handling our case. Her expertise, dedication, and clear communication played a major role in the successful outcome of our family’s immigration matter. I also want to sincerely thank Mr. Scott and the entire team for their outstanding support throughout the entire process. Their collective effort, attention to detail, and commitment to our case were truly phenomenal. I highly recommend this team to anyone in need of legal assistance, especially with immigration-related matters. Their professionalism and results speak for themselves.Posted on Google![]()
Martha PoolTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I recently had an appointment with Scott and I can't thank him enough. He is very professional and helped me with my current case. I highly recommend him!Posted on Google![]()
Muzammil MohammedTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Lindsay was really helpful with my family member's N400 filing. She is really knowledgeable and knows her stuff. Would definately hire her again for any immigration processings.Posted on Google![]()
srivas venkateshTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can't recommend Kathryn Weber and her team enough. She, along with her paralegal Miguel, provided exceptional guidance throughout my immigration process. They were extremely helpful in navigating all of the applications and explaining the various laws involved. Their expertise and support made a complex journey feel manageable. If you are looking for a trustworthy and knowledgeable immigration attorney, I highly recommend Kathryn as well as the firm.
Whether you are applying for naturalization and want it done right, or you have received notice of a denaturalization case, the details matter and the stakes are high. For over three decades, Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. has guided people through naturalization, citizenship, and removal defense. Call 312.444.1940 or fill out our online contact form today.