Immigration Lawyer Chicago/ Resources/ Immigration Insights/ DACA to Green Card Employment: Is It Possible in 2026?
Immigration Insights
Article by Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. staff
06/10/2026
For hundreds of thousands of people who came to the United States as children, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) offered a path forward. In 2026, that path is narrower and less stable than it has ever been. Ongoing litigation, shifting federal enforcement priorities, and new policy guidance have left many recipients uncertain as to what may come next.
One question that arises frequently: is an employment-based green card a realistic path to permanent residency? The answer depends heavily on individual circumstances, but for many DACA recipients, it remains a viable option worth pursuing carefully.
Current court orders prohibit USCIS from approving new, initial DACA requests. The agency continues to accept and hold those filings, but for anyone who has never held DACA status, approval is not possible while litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas remains ongoing.
Courts are currently deciding whether DACA recipients can continue receiving employment authorization. This uncertainty has practical consequences beyond the individual recipient: employers face real questions about whether to hire DACA holders, given the risk that legal protections could shift without warning.
Recent federal policy guidance has characterized deferred action as an “extraordinary” exercise of prosecutorial discretion—language that immigration advocates warn could be used to narrow or reinterpret DACA’s scope going forward. The argument that DACA exceeded executive authority has never been resolved legislatively, leaving the program dependent on how courts and administrations choose to read that discretion.
Perhaps most alarmingly, having an active DACA grant no longer guarantees protection from enforcement action. Recent cases have involved the detention or attempted removal of current DACA recipients, including during renewal proceedings and following routine interactions with immigration authorities. Recent BIA guidance suggests that DACA status alone may not be sufficient to halt removal proceedings—a significant shift from how the program was originally understood.
For DACA recipients, an employment-based green card can offer something DACA never could: a status that doesn’t expire, isn’t subject to renewal cycles, and doesn’t depend on the outcome of the next court ruling. That distinction matters enormously for people who have spent years building careers, families, and lives in the United States.
The path is not without significant obstacles, and the broader immigration climate means that attitudes toward even established programs can shift. But for those who qualify, the protections a green card confers are meaningfully more stable than anything DACA provides, including:
Employment-based green cards generally require these steps:
For many DACA recipients, adjustment of status is the biggest obstacle to an employment-based green card. Under immigration law, individuals must have entered the U.S. lawfully to apply for a green card within the United States—a requirement that creates significant complications for those who entered without inspection as children. Eligibility depends heavily on manner of entry, immigration history, and periods of unlawful presence.
Even with a sponsoring employer in place, completing the green card process may still require leaving the U.S. for consular processing abroad. Departing the country can trigger a three or ten-year unlawful presence bar, creating substantial immigration risks that require careful evaluation before any decision is made.
Processing times add another layer of uncertainty. Employment-based green card applications can face significant backlogs, and for DACA recipients, the waiting period carries particular risk — status can shift while a case is pending, and the current enforcement climate makes that exposure more consequential than it might otherwise be.
Given the complexity and the stakes involved, individualized legal review is strongly advisable before pursuing any of these steps.
Employment-based green cards are divided into preference categories, each with different eligibility requirements. The most relevant for DACA recipients are:
For DACA recipients, no two employment-based green card cases are alike. The viability of any pathway depends on a specific combination of factors, including:
The attorneys at Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. have represented clients in complex immigration and removal matters for over 30 years, and understand the particular challenges DACA recipients face in the current legal environment. A consultation with the firm can help identify what options are realistically available—and what risks to avoid before any decisions are made.
To schedule a consultation, call (312) 444-1940 or fill out our online contact form.
View Similar Articles