Immigration Lawyer Chicago/ Immigration Forms for U.S. Citizenship, Naturalization, and Admission/ Form I-766: Employment Authorization Document (EAD) Guide
Form I-766 is the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) card issued to eligible nonimmigrant visa holders who are authorized to work in the United States. It is obtained by filing Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with USCIS; the I-766 card is the physical document that results from an approved I-765 application.
This article covers who is eligible for an EAD, how to apply, required evidence, and what to do when it comes time to renew or replace the card.
Form I-766 is the physical EAD card that serves as proof of work authorization in the United States. It is not a visa and does not confer immigration status; it is a standalone document authorizing employment for those whose immigration status requires it.
EAD validity periods typically range from one to two years depending on the immigration category. The card must be renewed before it expires to maintain continuous work authorization.
EAD eligibility depends on immigration category. In general, an EAD is required when an immigration status either permits work but requires documented authorization, or when work permission must be specifically requested. Categories that commonly require an EAD include:
A full list of eligible categories is available on the USCIS Form I-765 checklist. Eligibility does not guarantee approval; a complete application with the correct supporting evidence is required for each specific category.
Lawful permanent residents and U.S. citizens do not need an EAD, as work authorization is inherent to their status.
The two form numbers refer to different things. Form I-765 is the application submitted to USCIS to request employment authorization. Form I-766 is the EAD card itself: the physical document issued upon approval that serves as proof of work authorization. Filing Form I-765 is how an applicant obtains a Form I-766 card.
To obtain an EAD card, applicants file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with USCIS. Applicants working with an attorney must also include Form G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney.
All Form I-765 applications must include:
Additional documentation is required depending on the specific eligibility category. For example, refugee applicants must include a final notice of eligibility for resettlement and Form I-797. Applicants filing under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) file Form I-765 concurrently with or after Form I-821, along with documentation of TPS approval from an EOIR immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals. The USCIS Form I-765 checklist provides a full breakdown of required evidence by category.
The correct filing address depends on the applicant’s eligibility category. Current direct filing addresses are available on the USCIS Form I-765 filing addresses page.
The Form I-765 filing fee is $520 by mail or $470 online. The separate biometrics fee has been eliminated for most EAD categories. Current fee information and any applicable exceptions are available on the USCIS fee schedule.
An approved EAD card serves as an I-9 employment eligibility verification document and should be presented to employers when starting work.
EAD renewals are filed using a new Form I-765. USCIS recommends filing no more than 180 days before the current EAD expires to avoid a gap in work authorization. A copy of the most recent EAD must be included with the renewal application. Renewal eligibility is subject to the same requirements as the original application.
A replacement EAD may be needed if the card has been lost, stolen, or destroyed, or if it contains incorrect information. Replacement is requested by filing a new Form I-765 with the applicable filing fee. A fee waiver may be requested, though approval is not guaranteed.
If the incorrect information is not due to a USCIS error, the original EAD card must be submitted along with the new application. If the error is USCIS’s fault, a corrected card will be issued at no charge upon return of the original card and a written explanation of the error.
Posted on Google Sumaiah AlbalwiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I had the pleasure of working with attorney Kathryn Weber and her paralegal Hannah, and I couldn’t be more grateful for the level of professionalism, care, and attention they provided. Kathryn was truly outstanding — she is extremely knowledgeable in her field, incredibly patient, and explains every detail clearly so you always feel confident and supported. Her calm, thorough approach turns a stressful process into something manageable and reassuring. Hannah was amazing and always responsive, organized, and kind. Together, they make a strong team that truly advocates for their clients with compassion and expertise. I highly recommend Kathryn and her office to anyone looking for guidance from a team that genuinely cares about people and knows the law exceptionally well. Thank you for everything!Posted on Google ZIZO AlbaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I can’t thank Kathryn Weber enough for her kindness, support, and hard work during my family case. She not only provided excellent legal guidance but also showed real compassion and understanding. I’m truly grateful for everything she’s done for me and my family. Thank you so much Kathryn 🙏🏻❤️Posted on Google Carolyn BraaksmaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Kathryn Weber and her team were truly exemplary in representing my husband’s immigration journey. Kathryn’s expertise, knowledge, compassion, and genuine care turned what could have been a stressful process into a positive and successful experience. We cannot thank her enough for her outstanding service and support. We give her our highest recommendation for anyone seeking help with immigration needs.Posted on Google Caren LedererTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Very knowledgeable and professional, I feel confident in the advice and feel better knowing I can rely on Anne!Posted on Google Mohemed AhmedTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C., is a highly professional law firm that offers essential assistance, guidance, and support to its clients. Christina Murdoch, a Partner at the firm, has been exceptionally supportive, knowledgeable, and professional throughout our legal process. Her extensive experience and expertise have been instrumental in helping us make sound decisions that ultimately led to our complete success. I highly recommend Christina Murdoch and Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C., as a firm specializing in immigration law, processes, and procedures.Posted on Google hi INDiA hemant brahmbhattTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Exceptional Legal Support and Professionalism I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to Christina Murdoch for the incredible professionalism and care she demonstrated while handling our case. Her expertise, dedication, and clear communication played a major role in the successful outcome of our family’s immigration matter. I also want to sincerely thank Mr. Scott and the entire team for their outstanding support throughout the entire process. Their collective effort, attention to detail, and commitment to our case were truly phenomenal. I highly recommend this team to anyone in need of legal assistance, especially with immigration-related matters. Their professionalism and results speak for themselves.Posted on Google Martha PoolTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I recently had an appointment with Scott and I can't thank him enough. He is very professional and helped me with my current case. I highly recommend him!Posted on Google Muzammil MohammedTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Lindsay was really helpful with my family member's N400 filing. She is really knowledgeable and knows her stuff. Would definately hire her again for any immigration processings.Posted on Google srivas venkateshTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I can't recommend Kathryn Weber and her team enough. She, along with her paralegal Miguel, provided exceptional guidance throughout my immigration process. They were extremely helpful in navigating all of the applications and explaining the various laws involved. Their expertise and support made a complex journey feel manageable. If you are looking for a trustworthy and knowledgeable immigration attorney, I highly recommend Kathryn as well as the firm.
Applicants with a pending Form I-485 must file for an EAD to work legally during the adjustment of status process. In some cases, such as a K-1 fiancé(e) visa status adjustment, an existing EAD may also be required as a supporting document. Eligibility and requirements vary depending on the specific adjustment scenario.
K-1 visa holders may apply for an EAD while in the United States, but given that the K-1 visa expires within 90 days of entry and is contingent on marriage, many applicants find it more practical to wait until after marriage and then apply for an EAD based on their updated immigration status.
EAD eligibility, required evidence, and filing requirements vary significantly depending on immigration category. An error or missing document can result in a Request for Evidence and delay work authorization. Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. has represented clients in employment authorization matters for over 30 years.
Call 312.444.1940 or fill out our online contact form to discuss your situation with an experienced immigration attorney.